Judge rules US and UK passengers can join Ruby Princess class action

International passengers involved in the Australian class action over the coronavirus outbreak on board the Ruby Princess have won their right to be included in the lawsuit, a judge has ruled.

Susan Karpik commenced representative proceedings against Carnival plc, the time charterer of the vessel, and Princess Cruise Lines Ltd, the owner and operator of the Ruby Princess.

The ruling will allow passengers from the United States and the United Kingdom to be included in the class action.

In Federal Court on Friday, Justice Angus Stewart rejected a preliminary application to stop a “sub-group” of overseas passengers from being part of the action.

Of the 2,651 passengers onboard, the respondents allege that 696 contracted their cruise on US terms and conditions and 159 contracted on UK terms and conditions. The balance are said to have contracted on Australian terms and conditions.

The differing conditions include a class action waiver clause in the US terms.

Ms Karpik alleges the respondents were in breach of their duties of care and allowed the voyage to proceed. She also alleged that they failed to take adequate measures to protect passengers from the risk of COVID-19 and also said they allegedly engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct and breached their consumer guarantees under the Australian Consumer Law.

But Justice Stewart ruled it wasn’t necessary or appropriate at this early stage of the proceedings to determine the law applicable to the US and UK sub groups’ negligence claims.

He noted a stay on the US passengers would result in the fracturing of the litigation with essentially identical claims being brought in the Federal Court and any stayed claims being brought in the US.

“Such a result is wasteful of parties’ and judicial resources and runs the risk of producing conflicting outcomes in different courts, which would bring the administration of justice into disrepute.”

The Federal Court was “not a clearly inappropriate forum” for the determination of the claims of the overseas passengers, the judge said.

Those claims had a substantial connection with NSW as many of the breaches of duty of care that are alleged concern conduct or omissions in Sydney.

A number of passengers contracted COVID-19 onboard the Ruby Princess after she departed from Sydney in on March 8, 2020 and returned from visiting a number of ports in New Zealand on March 19, 2020. Several passengers died after disembarking.

The case will return to court on September 17.

Related
Norwegian Sun cruise ship sailing on the water

Norwegian Cruise Line cancelled 38 cruises including South Pacific voyages

Norwegian Cruise Line has cancelled around five months of cruises across three ships – equating to nearly 40 itineraries.
Woman on a cruise ship upset about her cruise

Laura’s cruise was swapped from the sunny South Pacific to Hobart – she got her money back and so can you

It's one of the biggest legal dilemmas in cruise: if the itinerary changes, are you entitled to compensation?
The Royal Princess.

Royal Princess’ ‘partial turnaround’ may bring $568,000 to Hobart – could this be the solution to our regional cruise woes?

In a first for Princess Cruises and Tasmania, a partial turnaround cruise on Royal Princess was operated to Hobart, meaning passengers could start and end their cruise in Tasmania, even though the larger itinerary starts and ends in different ports. ... Read more
The Pacific Explorer cruise ship.

Class Action alleges cruise lines use ‘predatory behaviour’ to lure passengers into racking up casino debts

Carter Capner Law is opening a class-action against Carnival Corporation due to alleged predatory gambling practices.